top of page
MSC logo

Vietnam's Shift to Ex-post Regulation

Writer: Huong Nguyen, LL.M
Huong Nguyen, LL.M
2 hours ago
5 min read

Over the past year, "shifting decisively from ex-ante control to ex-post control" has become a recurring phrase across Party resolutions, National Assembly sessions, and a series of newly enacted laws in Vietnam. This is no longer a vague reform slogan: it has been codified into specific, quantifiable provisions with clear effective dates. This article outlines the legal basis of the shift, assesses its implications for foreign direct investment, and proposes an approach for investors to optimize market-entry costs while managing long-term compliance costs.

1. The legal basis of the shift

The political foundation was laid by two 2025 Politburo resolutions. Resolution No. 66-NQ/TW (30 April 2025) calls for a transparent, data- and technology-driven legal system in place of heavy administrative procedure. Resolution No. 68-NQ/TW (4 May 2025) affirms the shift from ex-ante to ex-post control in appropriate sectors, while preserving ex-ante control for high-risk, hard-to-reverse areas such as healthcare, finance and banking, food safety, the environment, and cybersecurity. Both resolutions condition this shift on an interconnected national data infrastructure and an effective sanctions regime, meaning ex-post control is not a lower level of regulation, but a different instrument: from pre-licensing review to ongoing monitoring.

This direction is most concretely codified in the Law Amending and supplementing certain articles of the Investment Law (Law No. 24/2026/QH16), passed on 24 May 2026 and effective 1 March 2027, the largest-ever reduction in conditional business lines, removing 62 lines and amending 14, a 28.28% cut from the 2025 Investment Law and 40% from the 2020 law, exceeding the Party Central Committee's 30% target. Per the Ministry of Finance, the reform eliminates roughly 786 business conditions and 232 overlapping procedures, saving enterprises an estimated VND 175 billion and 7,500 working hours annually. Crucially, cuts follow risk classification rather than blanket reduction: high-risk, hard-to-reverse activities (farm-scale livestock, breeding, unmanned aircraft, visa-support services involving personal data) remain conditional or face tighter rules, while sectors with established technical standards (clean water, LPG/LNG/CNG, alcohol) move to ex-post self-compliance. The law also bars ministries and localities from adding conditions beyond the statutory list.

The same logic applies to the amended Enterprise Law (Law No. 76/2025/QH15, effective 1 July 2025), which enables fast digital registration but tightens ex-post accountability, requiring correction of under-contributed charter capital and disclosure of beneficial owners within three working days of change. The Electricity Law 2024 (effective 1 February 2025) similarly abolished licensing for electricity consulting, and the Ministry of Industry and Trade has since proposed cutting about 61% of electricity-sector business conditions, exceeding its 50% target. For power projects, particularly renewable energy and direct power purchase agreements, this shortens time to market considerably, while responsibility for maintaining technical and safety conditions through the license term now rests with the enterprise, subject to ex-post oversight by the sector regulator. Together, these examples show a coherent reform line spanning investment, enterprise governance, and infrastructure, designed consistently from Party policy through National Assembly legislation to Government implementing regulations.

2. Implications for Foreign investors

Ex-post regulation directly cuts market-entry time and cost, the stage where investors face the greatest financial pressure, since procedural costs are incurred before a project generates revenue. The removal of 62 conditional business lines, the abolition of the electricity consulting license, and the digitization of enterprise registration all reduce the number of required permits, shorten waiting times, and lessen dependence on the discretionary licensing process that has long been a bottleneck for investors unfamiliar with Vietnam's administrative system.

However, ex-post control does not mean less oversight, only a later point of control. Legal advisory practice shows that risks tied to capital, business lines, or ownership structure are typically discovered two to five years into operation, when remediation is far costlier than early compliance. Key risk areas include confusion between charter capital and investment capital (a commonly penalized error), beneficial-ownership disclosure pressuring multi-tier holding structures toward transparency, and growing cross-agency data integration that makes filing discrepancies easier to detect. For multinationals under the global minimum tax regime, narrower tax incentives make upfront compliance even more important. In short, ex-post regulation shifts the burden of proof from the state to the enterprise, a trade-off between entry speed and sustained compliance discipline.

3. Capturing the benefits of this shift

Investors should classify their business lines against the risk-differentiation principle as early as the feasibility stage, since sectors like healthcare, finance, food safety, environment, cybersecurity, and personal-data services remain under ex-ante control. Legal and financial documentation, charter capital versus investment capital, beneficial-owner identification, correct business-line registration, should be treated as risk-mitigation investment, not a cost to minimize for faster licensing.

Enterprises should also run continuous internal compliance rather than front-loading effort at the licensing stage, periodically reviewing capital contributions, ownership disclosures, and sector-specific technical conditions. Transitional provisions deserve attention too: the amended Investment Law allows enterprises that already hold licenses to keep using them until their stated expiry without renewal, and allows business lines with removed conditions to be operated immediately, without meeting the former requirements. Timing new filings around the law's 1 March 2027 effective date can help investors avoid having to comply with both old and new conditions within a short window. Finally, simplified entry should not be mistaken for lighter sanctions; current law pairs ex-post control with stronger self-compliance duties and sector inspection. Budget once reserved for initial licensing is better redirected toward internal audit, compliance training, and ongoing legal and tax advisory, a more sustainable way to control long-term compliance costs.

Conclusion

The shift from ex-ante to ex-post regulation is a substantive institutional transformation, driven by Politburo resolutions and given concrete form through the amended Investment Law, amended Enterprise Law, the 2024 Electricity Law, and related implementing regulations. For foreign investors, it offers real gains in market-entry speed without loosening the underlying compliance requirement. The sound approach is to make full use of streamlined entry while proactively building internal compliance capacity, avoiding the costlier remediation that ex-post enforcement can bring.


*Check out our services or contact us to discuss your Vietnam market strategy.


References

  1. Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam, Resolution No. 66-NQ/TW, dated April 30, 2025, on Renewing Lawmaking and Law Enforcement to Meet National Development Requirements in the New Era.

  2. Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam, Resolution No. 68-NQ/TW, dated May 4, 2025, on Private Sector Economic Development.

  3. National Assembly of Vietnam, Electricity Law, No. 61/2024/QH15, dated November 30, 2024 (effective February 1, 2025).

  4. National Assembly of Vietnam, Law Amending and Supplementing a Number of Articles of the Law on Enterprises, No. 76/2025/QH15, dated June 17, 2025 (effective July 1, 2025).

  5. National Assembly of Vietnam, Law Amending and Supplementing a Number of Articles of the Law on Investment, No. 24/2026/QH16, dated August 24, 2026 (effective March 1, 2027).

  6. Government Portal for Policy and Legislation (Xây dựng chính sách), "Amendments to the Investment Law: 62 Conditional Business Lines Removed," Vietnam Government Electronic Newspaper, August 25, 2025, https://xaydungchinhsach.chinhphu.vn/sua-doi-bo-sung-luat-dau-tu-cat-giam-62-nganh-nghe-kinh-doanh-co-dieu-kien-119260825083037432.htm.


*Disclaimer: This article reflects author's research and perspective for general informational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice for any specific case.

bottom of page