Vietnam's USD 312 billion state budget investment plan, 2026–2030
- Mai Luong, LL.M

- 2 days ago
- 7 min read
Abstract
This blog analyses Vietnam's Medium-Term Public Investment Plan 2026–2030 (Resolution 27/2026/QH16), a USD 312.29 billion state investment programme. It examines sector priorities, regional distribution, and the private investment the plan is designed to unlock. Physical infrastructure dominates ministry-level allocations, while five National Target Programmes direct funding toward education, rural development, and healthcare. Investment is geographically concentrated in the Southeast and Mekong Delta. For foreign firms, the plan functions less as a market in itself than as a demand signal: public capital is explicitly mandated to crowd in private and foreign investment across EPC contracting, PPP, digital infrastructure, healthcare, education, and green investment.
Keywords: public investment, Vietnam, infrastructure, 2026–2030, market entry, PPP, Resolution 27/2026/QH16
Exchange rate: 1 USD = 26,321.44 VND
Vietnam is entering a pivotal development phase with ambitious economic and infrastructure goals. Resolution No. 27/2026/QH16 has officially shaped the public investment roadmap for the next five years, focusing on streamlining, efficiency, and creating a breakthrough for the national economy.
The total public investment budget for the five-year period amounts to USD 312.29 billion (VND 8,220,000 billion), comprising USD 144.37 billion (VND 3,800,000 billion) from the central budget and USD 167.93 billion (VND 4,420,000 billion) from local government budgets.
Top two provincial recipients of central government transfers by region, 2026 to 2030 (USD million)

Beyond the sheer scale of investment, the government is placing greater emphasis on efficiency and implementation. Authorities aim to reduce the number of projects by at least 30% compared to the 2021–2025 period, allowing resources to be concentrated on projects with stronger spillover effects and national significance. At the same time, a disbursement rate exceeding 95% has been set as a key performance target, highlighting the government's intention to improve execution rather than simply increase spending.
Infrastructure remains the Top Priority
The central government's largest single ministry allocation goes to the Ministry of Construction and Vietnam Expressway Corporation at USD 5.76 billion, reflecting the priority placed on expressways, urban ring roads, and strategic transport corridors. The Ministry of National Defence follows at USD 4.08 billion, and the Ministry of Public Security at USD 1.18 billion.
Beyond ministry allocations, five National Target Programmes channel an additional USD 9.65 billion into education modernisation, rural development, healthcare, and cultural heritage. These areas are not captured in the ministry breakdown above.
These figures represent only the USD 27.24 billion already allocated in detail. The remaining USD 285 billion, comprising unallocated central funds and all provincial budgets, will also flow substantially into infrastructure and social programmes, but is not yet broken down by sector in the resolution.
Central government budget allocated to ministries and agencies, 2026–2030 (USD billion)

Note: These figures represent capital budget allocations to ministries and agencies from the central government, and do not represent total public investment in each sector.
"VEC" refers to Vietnam Expressway Corporation.
"Others" comprises 17 remaining ministries and agencies: Ho Chi Minh National Political Academy, Ministry of Culture Sports and Tourism, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Supreme People's Procuracy, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ministry of Education and Training, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Home Affairs, Vietnam National University Hanoi, Office of the Government, Supreme People's Court, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Trade, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Vietnam Fatherland Front Central Committee, and Vietnam News Agency.
Major National Programmes and Strategic Projects
Among the central budget allocations, five National Target Programmes will receive approximately USD 9.65 billion. Education receives the largest allocation within this group, with USD 3.23 billion dedicated to modernisation and quality improvement initiatives. Rural development, poverty reduction, and support for ethnic minority communities will receive approximately USD 2.66 billion, while cultural development is allocated nearly USD 1.90 billion. Additional funding is earmarked for healthcare and population development (USD 1.49 billion) and drug prevention programmes (USD 0.37 billion).
At the same time, approximately USD 7.30 billion has been allocated to nationally important projects, including both ongoing and newly approved initiatives.
The largest individual allocation goes to the North–South High-Speed Railway, which is set to receive approximately USD 2.16 billion during the planning period. Another major priority is the Lao Cai–Hanoi–Hai Phong Railway, with funding of approximately USD 1.71 billion, a freight and passenger corridor that will directly connect Vietnam's northern border trade zone to the Port of Hai Phong.
Several large-scale road infrastructure projects are also featured prominently. Hanoi's Ring Road 4 is allocated approximately USD 461 million, while the Tay Ninh section of Ho Chi Minh City's Ring Road 4 receives more than USD 1.13 billion, making it the single largest provincial transfer in the plan. In the Mekong Delta, Phase 1 of the Chau Doc–Can Tho–Soc Trang Expressway is allocated approximately USD 671 million, reflecting the government's growing focus on improving connectivity in southern Vietnam.
Geographic Distribution: The South Leads
The provincial allocation data reveals a clear geographic logic. Southern provinces dominate, driven by the concentration of major infrastructure corridors passing through the region. Tay Ninh leads all provincial recipients at USD 1.13 billion, a figure explained almost entirely by the Ring Road 4 alignment, followed by Can Tho at USD 0.86 billion and Hanoi at USD 0.63 billion.
An Giang (USD 0.45 billion) and Ho Chi Minh City (USD 0.36 billion) round out the top five. Together, the Southeast and Mekong Delta regions account for nearly two-thirds of all provincial transfers under the central budget, reflecting the government's strategic focus on the country's two main economic engines and their physical connectivity to each other and to international trade routes.
Top provincial recipients of central government transfers, 2026 to 2030 (USD billion)

Hanoi's USD 0.63 billion, by contrast, reflects a more diversified portfolio: Ring Road 4, metro co-financing, and its role as the northern terminus of both the high-speed rail and the Lao Cai–Hai Phong freight corridor. The capital's allocation underscores a broader pattern: the plan is less about equalising regional incomes than about connecting Vietnam's economic poles with infrastructure commensurate with their ambitions.
Opportunities for foreign companies entering Vietnam
The resolution is not a foreign investment framework, but it contains a structural logic that shapes the opportunity landscape for any company considering Vietnam as a market or a base. The government is explicit that public capital is intended to mobilise, not substitute for, private and foreign investment. In that sense, the figures above are better read as signals than as the full picture: each dollar of public investment in a highway, a railway, or a digital platform is designed to unlock multiples in private activity downstream.
Infrastructure supply chain: construction, engineering, and equipment
The scale of highway, rail, and port construction creates sustained demand for EPC contractors, engineering consultancies, construction materials, and specialised equipment. The expressway programme alone targets 5,000 km by 2030; the high-speed rail and the Lao Cai–Hai Phong line together represent the largest rail investment in Vietnamese history. These are not small projects, but the public allocation funds only part of the total cost. Private co-investment, supplier contracts, and operations and maintenance agreements represent the larger commercial opportunity. International firms with relevant track records in Southeast Asian rail or road projects are well positioned, particularly in joint venture structures with Vietnamese state-owned constructors.
Public-private partnership in strategic infrastructure
The resolution repeatedly invokes PPP as the primary mechanism for mobilising non-state capital. Toll roads, urban transit, port terminals, and smart city infrastructure are the most likely vehicles. For foreign investors, PPP arrangements offer a structured entry into assets with long-dated, state-backed revenue streams. Vietnam's track record in transport PPP has improved significantly since the 2024 PPP Law revision, and the plan's explicit endorsement of this model signals continued regulatory support. The public investment here functions as a guarantee of demand, not a ceiling on total investment.
Digital infrastructure, cloud, and government technology
National digital infrastructure, encompassing data centres, cloud platforms, and government digital services, sits at the heart of the plan's modernisation agenda. The resolution mandates synchronised, interconnected national databases and a full digital government stack. Public procurement in this space tends to catalyse private sector adoption: when government systems migrate to cloud and digital platforms, enterprise and commercial demand typically follows. This creates procurement opportunities for data centre operators, cloud providers, and GovTech firms, particularly those able to navigate public sector tendering or partner with Vietnamese state technology entities such as VNPT and Viettel.
Healthcare equipment and hospital services
The USD 1.49 billion healthcare programme funds facility upgrades, medical equipment procurement, and population health management at scale. Taken in isolation, the figure is modest. But public hospital investment in Vietnam has historically been the primary driver of private hospital development in adjacent locations, as upgraded public facilities raise patient expectations and create demand that the public system cannot fully absorb. Foreign companies with established local distribution partners are best placed to capture procurement flows as they accelerate, and to benefit from the private sector expansion that tends to follow.
Education, training, and human capital services
At USD 3.23 billion, the education programme is the largest social investment in the plan. It targets systemic quality uplift, curriculum reform, teacher training, and vocational infrastructure rather than simply building classrooms. Public investment in education quality has a well-documented effect on private education demand: as national standards rise, families and employers seek supplementary and higher-quality options that the public system cannot yet provide. For international education institutions, edtech platforms, and workforce training providers, the public programme is less a market in itself than a rising tide that lifts the entire sector.
Green infrastructure, energy transition, and climate adaptation
The resolution explicitly links investment priorities to green transition, renewable energy security, and climate resilience, including flood control, saltwater intrusion management, and coastal protection in the Mekong Delta. Public investment in this space is still finding its procurement frameworks, but the direction is clear and the pipeline is real. For environmental engineering firms, clean energy developers, and climate-resilient infrastructure specialists, early positioning matters more here than in more mature sectors, precisely because the market structure is still being defined.
The overarching signal for foreign market entrants is one of timing. The plan's five-year window is front-loaded: the resolution instructs the government to disburse at a rate exceeding 95% of annual allocations and to concentrate spending on projects already in procurement. The public investment figures in this plan are the foundation, not the ceiling. Companies that position themselves in 2026–2027 through local partnerships, supplier registrations, or early PPP feasibility engagement will be better placed than those who wait for a fully formed project pipeline to materialise. The infrastructure cycle Vietnam is now entering is a rare convergence of political will, committed funding, and delivery pressure, and the private investment it is designed to unlock is where the larger opportunity lies.
*Check out our services or contact us to discuss your Vietnam market entry.
References
Resolution No. 27/2026/QH16, passed by the National Assembly on April 24, 2026, on the Medium-Term Public Investment Plan for the 2026–2030 period.



